Saturday, 31 August 2024
The Relentless 'Old Man' and 'The Sea'
Sunday, 11 August 2024
Final Solutions by Mahesh Dattani
Greeting,
The Department of English at MKBU organized a 'Drama Workshop' from July 15 to 22. This workshop was conducted by the department's research scholar, Alpa Ponda, who is pursuing her PhD on 'Drama Pedagogy' in the literature classroom. During the workshop, we learned many aspects of drama and its performance. Students also had the opportunity to perform the drama 'Final Solutions' on stage, which is part of our syllabus. We are all thankful to Alpa ma'am and our HOD, Dr. Dilip Barad for giving us this opportunity.
This blog post reflects on my experiences and learning from the recent Drama Workshop organized by the Department of English at MKBU. Over the course of the workshop, I gained valuable insights into drama and its performance techniques. I will also share my personal experience of performing the drama 'Final Solutions' and address some reflective questions along with my answers.
We also engaged in the 'Vachikam' of the drama, a group reading that ran couple of days. During these sessions, we discussed the core themes of the play. The superficiality and guilt of Ramnik's character were clearly exposed during the reading. Ramnik was aware that his family had burned down Zarine's father's shop and purchased it at half its value. This awareness was the reason he defended Javed and Bobby superficially and allowed them to stay for the night, while Hardika and Aruna opposed them.
The chorus is one of the most important parts of the play, as it sets the initial tone and represents the Hindu and Muslim communities, each with their own violent and extreme attitudes towards one another. Among the two roles I played, the role of the chorus was relatively easier for me, as it primarily involved expressing anger. On the other hand, Bobby's character required deeper, more intense emotions and mixed facial expressions, which was challenging for me, given that it was my first time performing in a drama. Yet, I did my best to give justice to the role.
Casting For This Scene
Aakash as Bobby
Jay as Javed
Akshay as Ramnik
Bhumi as Smita
In addition to performing and learning how to act, I learnt about collaborative work, connecting with characters, and understanding how they evolve throughout the play. I also learned about the importance of props, lighting, and music in enhancing the overall drama performance. These elements are crucial in bringing the play to life.
You can observe the frame, on the left side we have old Hardika, and on the other side newly married Daksha, and Hardika is recalling her past through diary.
Thursday, 8 August 2024
Post-Colonial Studies | Sunday Reading Task
Hello,
We have just started our unit on post-colonial studies, and our professor, Dr. Dilip Barad, has provided the basic outline for this unit. To further our work on this unit, we were assigned a Sunday reading task, which involves watching three TED Talks by the prominent Nigerian novelist Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie and writing about the ideas we found most compelling.
This blogs post contains a few ideas from the videos. Click here for Teacher's blog.
Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie
Chimamanda is a prolific feminist Nigerian novelist, short story, and non-fiction writers. Her works explores the aspects of black feminism in general, and talks about the hardships, that is faced by black women across the world. She has written the novels such as, Purple Hibiscus (2003), Half of a Yellow Sun (2006), and Americanah (2013), the short story collection The Thing Around Your Neck (2009), and the book-length essay We Should All Be Feminists (2014).
Dangers of the 'Only Story'
Chimamanda Adichie discusses the danger of the "single story" or the idea of a single narrative about any country, race, or group of people. This creation of a single narrative generates stereotypes about specific groups. She shares her own experience, as a child, she was an avid reader and read many British and American children's literature books. She was influenced by British fiction and believed that heroes or heroines could only be white-skinned people with blue eyes. She never thought that a character like herself could also be the protagonist until she discovered other African writers like Chinua Achebe.
This is the powerful influence of a single story. Literature produced before the advent of postcolonial studies often portrayed Black people as primitive, "Other," and uncivilized. For a long time, white people have considered Black people as savages and constructed a single story about all African Black people as ruthless and uncivilized, waiting to be civilized by white people. British writers began this long ago, depicting Africans or Black people as primitive and savage. If white people were good, Africans were bad. If white people represented light, then Black people were trapped in darkness. On a binary level, Africans were always marginalized and seen as perpetually inferior in every aspect of life. Black people are referred to as "half-devil, half-child" in the poem by one of the most prominent poets, Rudyard Kipling. Shakespeare's work "The Tempest" is considered archetypal in postcolonial studies, where Shakespeare imagines an uncivilized man named Caliban on an uninhabited island, where Prospero teaches him his language and enslaves him. Writers like Joseph Conrad portray Africans as very savage and uncivilized in his work 'Heart of Darkness'.
Saturday, 3 August 2024
Lab Activity | CLiC Dickens Project
HELLO,
This blog task is prepared in response to the lab activity assigned by Dr. Barad Sir. In this task we have to explore CLiC Dickens Project and it's CLiC activity book, and have to do small activity based on that booklet. Click here for the project.
I will be doing couple of thematic activities.
Activity 1. The Creation of Fictional Characters
This activity emphasis on that the character that are depicted in literature are representation or near representation of actual human beings. We imagine those characters as if they have thoughts, feelings and experience just like real peoples. The point is that just as we understand these fictional characters are the same way we understand people around us.
In this activity the example is takes on Mr. Dick from David Copperfield. How that character is portrayed in the novel, at what time that character comes. Mr. Dick writes an autobiography called a "Memorial" but keeps getting distracted by a picture of King Charles I. This distraction is meaningful because "Dick" is short for "Richard," and it connects to King Charles I. This suggests that Mr. Dick could represent a part of Charles Dickens, showing how characters in books can reflect their authors in interesting ways. No one talks about Mr. Dick unless he is there, and also there is narratorial focus on Mr. Dick's face and mouth. We will see this thing in the activity.
Picking up the Character
After going through CLiC concordance, we get to know that Mr. Dick is referred in the novel 229 times.
After doing this activity, I find that Mr. Dick is someone who is not a man of action, or a strong agency. He is associated with weak verbs that does not denote relatively strong action. For example, "Laugh", "Recovered", " Shook", and "Accompanied"...etc.
Picking out the characterization
After searching Mr. Dick from non-quotes, we find that Mr. Dick is referred 178 times, which is under 200, and from which we can analyze any particular pattern in the characterization on Mr. Dick.
Mr. Dick in "David Copperfield" is depicted as whimsical and scattered, often repeating lines and phrases and showing variable thought processes. However, he has surprising moments of sharpness, especially in interactions with Aunt Betsey, who alternates between frustration and appreciation of his insights. This dynamic adds depth to both characters.
Isolating the reporting clause
More than half of the times Mr. Dick is mentioned in the story, it’s to report what he said. If you include other words that describe speaking, like "returned," "suggested," "rejoined," "asked," and "cried," you’ll see that Mr. Dick gets to speak for himself a lot in the story.
Exploring the narrative comments on the character
This shows short list of sentences about 12. Almost all of these mentions also include details about his body language, feelings, or thoughts. For example, looking, thinking, in a hurry, and shaking.
Face and features of the character
Searching facial expressions and features we can get to know about how character is portrayed.
Eyes and mouth referred one time
Head is sixteen times
Face referred three times
What is the Learning ?
From what I understand, this task is part of studying language or linguistic. By examining these details, we can learn about Mr. Dick's character. Even though I haven’t read the novel or know much about this character, we can understand who he is just by looking at how he is described in the text.
Activity 2: Growing up in Great Expectations
This activity suggests that, noble men and women largely belongs to the educated upper middle class. Then what about those young men and women who are not that much fortunate, who are uneducated poor, destitute and orphan people. Still orphans are the popular figure in the nineteenth century literary fiction.
in this activity the example given of Pip, an orphan protagonist from Dicken's novel "Great Expectation". Pip narrated his story from adult point of view.
Parenting in Great Expectations
In "Great Expectations", Pip is repeatedly advised to be grateful, yet he continually experiences feelings of regret. He often in the novel refers the phrase that he is brought 'up by hand'. And there are fourteen times where he uses this phrase.
By examining these phrases in larger context we get know know about how Pip is brought up by his sister Mrs. Gargery. She takes pride in her parenting of Pip with 'by hand', which means that Pip is brought up in strict and physically disciplined manner. Many time situation comes when Pip is portrayed in negative light by other character but as being an orphan child he can not do anything.
Moreover, Mr. Pumblechook also seems to praise the strict and disciplined methods of Mrs. Gargery in raising Pip. Pip goes through a very uncomfortable and thorough cleaning and dressing process done by his young guide, who treats him like he needs strict discipline. After being scrubbed, soaped, and put into stiff, formal clothes, Pip is handed over to Mr. Pumblechook, he then pompously reminds him to be grateful, especially to those who raised him with strict methods.
Gratitude and regret in Great Expectations
Why Pip is being (un)grateful
Pip is remorseful because he feels deeply ashamed of his ingratitude towards Joe, especially when contrasted with the deceitful and pompous Mr. Pumblechook. Pip is remorseful because he sees that Miss Havisham's self-destructive actions and isolation have led to her profound suffering and madness, which evokes Pip's deep compassion. He is also remorseful because he fears the consequences of his fight with the pale young gentleman, worrying that he will be punished for the injuries he caused and the evidence left on his clothing.
Pip mourns deeply over Estella's impact on his life, acknowledging her influence on both his good and bad impact. He chooses to remember the positive, and, overwhelmed by the moment, decides to walk to London to escape his distress and avoid facing others peoples.
Learning Outcome
Following this activity, we can observe a significant change in Pip's perspective. His way of thinking and understanding things has changed drastically. As an adult, Pip can now see and understand other characters more clearly, compared to his childhood views. For example, as a child, he admired Mr. Pumblechook, but as an adult, his admiration for him gradually wanes. Thus, by examining words like "grateful" and "ungrateful," we can gain insights into how Pip's views of characters evolve over time.
Thank you.
Friday, 2 August 2024
Laughing Buddha by Pravin Gadhvi
Hello,
Pravin Gadhavi, born 13 May 1951, is an IAS Officer in the Government of Gujarat. A prolific writer, his collections of poetry are Bayonet (1985), Padchhayo (1996) and Tunir (2002). His short story collections are Pratiksha (1995), Antarvyatha (1995) and Surajpankhi. The last publication was given Govt. of Gujarat Award.
Background of Poem
The title of the poem "Laughing Buddha" alludes to a significant event in Indian history. On 18th May, 1974, India covertly conducted a nuclear experiment in the desert of Pokhran, Rajasthan. This particular day was chosen for the atomic test because it was the birth anniversary of the deity Gautam Buddha. The operation was named 'Smiling Buddha.' The poet is referring to this idea in his poem.
Q) What should be of a higher moral importance for governing bodies, national security or basic needs of its citizens? What do you think is Gadhvi's opinion about this?
While answering this question, we have to consider many factors. Both national security and the basic needs of the people are equally important. However, the key issue here is understanding what the need of the hour is. This poem critiques the atomic experiment conducted by the Indian government because those were the early years of independent India, and the country was still struggling with many difficulties. Economic crises were at their peak, and there were major issues of poverty and the basic needs of food, clothing, and shelter. Keeping these factors in mind, the poet mocks the idea of this atomic test in the poem. The prime concern in the 1970s era was poverty, rather than focusing on nuclear experiments.
The issue of national security is also paramount. We are living in times when anything can happen to anyone at any time, you do not know when a country might suddenly declare war against your nation. A prime example in contemporary times is the conflict between Gaza and Israel.
Yes, it is true that the rise and fall of the significance of any historical event depend on the narrative built around it. In the context of this poem, it critiques the atomic experiment conducted in India. Such an event is crucial for any country, but the timing of the experiment was not appropriate. As discussed above, that was a time when the focus should have been on helping the poor people of India. In 1974, this experiment received significant criticism from both within and outside India. Literature took notice of this and portrayed it in a negative and unacclaimed manner.
However, a similar experiment was conducted later in 1998, which did not receive as much criticism as the first one. By that time, India was emerging as a developing country, and people's basic needs were being met. Thus, the decision was seen as appropriate and is remembered as a milestone in Indian history. This demonstrates how the way historical events are narrated in literature can affect our perception of specific events from the past.
This is significant line from the poem. From the ancient times, Indians have a ways to do specific things, like we look for specific date, time and place. So, keeping this thing in mind, we Indians have a tendency to do auspicious work on auspicious day. As far as this atomic experiment is concern, full moon day of Buddha Purnima was chosen, and it is believed to be a good day for begin any good work.
According to Henri Bergson, laughter or the comic exists only among what we call humans. For example, we laugh at a cat, but we actually laugh because we see human expressions or attitudes in that animal. On Instagram, we find many reels in which cats and dogs behave or walk like humans, and we consider it funny. We usually laugh at someone's folly or something that we do not consider ordinary or common. Such uncommon things or deeds are the subjects of laughter.
In this poem, the lines that repeatedly appear are "Buddha laughed, See, Buddha laughed." So what makes Buddha burst into laughter? There are two interpretations of this.
First, the atomic test carried out on the 'auspicious day' of Buddha Purnima is ironic. Buddha is a figure associated with tranquility, peace, and help. However, the Indian government chose such a peaceful day to conduct a violent experiment. This irony is one reason why Buddha might be laughing.
Second, as discussed earlier, 1974 was not the appropriate time to focus on national security. It was a time to aid the poor with their basic needs. Such nuclear experimentation requires substantial funding, and those who truly need the money are deprived of it. Therefore, Buddha may be laughing at the foolish decision of the Indian government.
Thank you.
The Ministry of Utmost Happiness | Flipped Class Activity
This blog post is part of a flipped learning task for the modern Indian novel The Ministry of Utmost Happiness by Arundhati Roy. As part of ...
-
Refer to the links for each presentation. Presentation Season 1 The first presentation season is a very memorable one for me. It was the fir...
-
Greeting, The Department of English at MKBU organized a 'Drama Workshop' from July 15 to 22. This workshop was conducted by ...
-
Bhav-spandan Youth Festival 2024 Greetings! As per the tradition of every year, this year's Youth Festival was held in Maharaja Krishnak...